TVS 2.3L guys post up your SAE Sheet's

[BEEKAY GT500]

i have a 2.3L dyno comparison thread over at ts and i know some of you are pushing 700+ on the TVS 2.3L. please post up your SAE sheets along with mods/fuel so i can get you added in. i'll post up the file here shortly.

TVS Comp 03.27.09.pdf

TVS Comp 06.09.09.pdf

[gr8snkbite]

you already have mine...but new recent numbers are in my sig...

[BEEKAY GT500]

Originally Posted by gr8snkbite

you already have mine...but new recent numbers are in my sig...

your signature is what caught my eye to post this up here. congrats on the 700+. i'll be waiting for you sheet

[gt500flyboy]

My sig has my numbers for the Evo Stage III, which I've had for the past year. Evo is now putting on the 2.9 Whipple, plus AR long tube headers with race cat x-pipe. So I'll be updating the numbers next week.

[gr8snkbite]

Originally Posted by BEEKAY GT500

your signature is what caught my eye to post this up here. congrats on the 700+. i'll be waiting for you sheet

dyno sheets in the dyno thread...

[BEEKAY GT500]

Originally Posted by gr8snkbite

dyno sheets in the dyno thread...

wow. you hit 700 without the 10% lower? nice. headers/exhaust was huge for you at your level. i'm not familar reading a mustang dyno sheet. what does the orange line running across the page at 375 mean? is there a correction factor associated with a mustang dyno?

[BEEKAY GT500]

Originally Posted by gt500flyboy

My sig has my numbers for the Evo Stage III, which I've had for the past year. Evo is now putting on the 2.9 Whipple, plus AR long tube headers with race cat x-pipe. So I'll be updating the numbers next week.

thanks for sharing but i'm compiling dyno runs of gt500's running a tvs. still interested in seeing your numbers when you get the 2.9l on. hope you post up your sheets so we can all share in your excitement.

[gr8snkbite]

Originally Posted by BEEKAY GT500

wow. you hit 700 without the 10% lower? nice. headers/exhaust was huge for you at your level. i'm not familar reading a mustang dyno sheet. what does the orange line running across the page at 375 mean? is there a correction factor associated with a mustang dyno?

thats just the boost curve...see the numbers at the bottom of the sheet..15lbs. first time on a mustang dyno, no familiar with it either. will be doing my normal local dyno, once JL and i can hook up and dial her in. Numbers will be higher for sure..but may wait till the L&M components are out...

and yes..no 10% lower...

[gt500flyboy]

Originally Posted by BEEKAY GT500

thanks for sharing but i'm compiling dyno runs of gt500's running a tvs. still interested in seeing your numbers when you get the 2.9l on. hope you post up your sheets so we can all share in your excitement.

oops. i need to read these posts better.

[King Cobra]

Don't know if this will give you what you want but here goes.

TVS with 2.6 pulley
08 lower dampner
American racing headers with new H-pipe (1st in the country)
Cobra Jet TB
Cobra jet MAF
Tuned by Jon Lund
93 octane pump gas
Mustang dyno
679 rwhp
652 rwtq
15.7 boost

[gr8snkbite]

Originally Posted by King Cobra

Don't know if this will give you what you want but here goes.

TVS with 2.6 pulley
08 lower dampner
American racing headers with new H-pipe (1st in the country)
Cobra Jet TB
Cobra jet MAF
Tuned by Jon Lund
93 octane pump gas
Mustang dyno
679 rwhp
652 rwtq
15.7 boost

you and i have the exact same setup, except TB and H pipe, and im making 32hp more...interesting. and im not even dialed in by Jon yet....

[King Cobra]

Originally Posted by gr8snkbite

you and i have the exact same setup, except TB and H pipe, and im making 32hp more...interesting. and im not even dialed in by Jon yet....

Yes.....I wouldn't think the TB and H-pipe would make that much difference. The thinking there was the CJ TB was a restriction compared to the mono blade.

I don't know this for sure, but I was told that the rear gearing would make a difference also in that it affects torque and horsepower is determined by torque. I have the 3.73' and if I remember right, you have the stock 3.31 gears. Maybe George or Blackshelby can confirm.

[TOMMY GUN]

Mine is on but not finalized.

I need Gr8snk's help in knowing what to send Lund (info wise) for my final tune.



LOL

[King Cobra]

Originally Posted by TOMMY GUN

Mine is on but not finalized.

I need Gr8snk's help in knowing what to send Lund (info wise) for my final tune.



LOL

I was very fortunate in that Jon was at EVO when we dynoed mine. He did (4) that day and said he did (25) in the 5 days prior.

[TOMMY GUN]

Originally Posted by King Cobra

I was very fortunate in that Jon was at EVO when we dynoed mine. He did (4) that day and said he did (25) in the 5 days prior.

That would be cool.

I don't know what he needs or how to do data logging for him?

.

[King Cobra]

Originally Posted by TOMMY GUN

That would be cool.

I don't know what he needs or how to do data logging for him?

.

Keith will have to help you with that. I don't know anything about data logging.......is a chain saw needed?

[TOMMY GUN]

I have a chainsaw if so.


.

[gr8snkbite]

Originally Posted by King Cobra

Yes.....I wouldn't think the TB and H-pipe would make that much difference. The thinking there was the CJ TB was a restriction compared to the mono blade.

I don't know this for sure, but I was told that the rear gearing would make a difference also in that it affects torque and horsepower is determined by torque. I have the 3.73' and if I remember right, you have the stock 3.31 gears. Maybe George or Blackshelby can confirm.

i forgot about the gearing..but your right about mine..

Originally Posted by TOMMY GUN

Mine is on but not finalized.

I need Gr8snk's help in knowing what to send Lund (info wise) for my final tune.


LOL

we can do this...just say when...we'll use the same info Jon and i used.

[Birdman]

Originally Posted by King Cobra

Yes.....I wouldn't think the TB and H-pipe would make that much difference. The thinking there was the CJ TB was a restriction compared to the mono blade.

I don't know this for sure, but I was told that the rear gearing would make a difference also in that it affects torque and horsepower is determined by torque. I have the 3.73' and if I remember right, you have the stock 3.31 gears. Maybe George or Blackshelby can confirm.

The monoBlade is worth 15rwhp over the CJ TB

Yes on some dynos a higher gear ratio will show a higher HP# than a lower geared car would. I believe it is in the way the numbers are calculated by the dyno computer. ( the engine however is not actually making any more or less HP)

[TOMMY GUN]

Originally Posted by gr8snkbite

we can do this...just say when...we'll use the same info Jon and i used.

.